The Question That Demolishes the
Theory of Evolution:
How did the DNA Originate?
question of how such an extraordinarily designed molecule
as DNA originated is one of the thousands of impasses
evolutionists reach. Seeking to explain life by means
of "coincidence", the theory of evolution
can never explain the source of the extraordinary information
so perfectly and meticulously encoded in DNA.
Moreover, the question is not only that of how the
DNA chain originated. Even the existence of the DNA
chain with the extraordinary information capacity it
contains, means nothing by itself. In order to refer
to life, it is essential that the enzymes that read
this DNA chain,copy them and produce proteins, also
exist. (Enzymes are large molecules that have certain
functions in the cell which they carry out with the
precision of a robot.)
Simply put, in order to talk of life, both the data
bank we call DNA, and the machines to carry out production
by reading the data in the bank have to co-exist.
To our surprise, enzymes, which read DNA and carry
out production accordingly, are themselves produced
according to the codes in DNA. This means that there
is a factory in the cell that both makes many different
types of products, and also manufactures the robots
and machines that carry out this production. The question
of how this system, which would be of no use with a
minor defect in any of its mechanisms originated, is
by itself enough to demolish the theory of evolution.
German evolutionist Douglas R. Hofstadler, states his
despair in the face of this question:
'How did the Genetic Code, along with the mechanisms
for its translation (ribosomes and RNA molecules), originate?'
For the moment, we will have to content ourselves with
a sense of wonder and awe, rather than with an answer.
Another evolutionist authority, world renowned molecular
biologist Leslie Orgel, is more outspoken on the subject:
It is extremely improbable that proteins and nucleic
acids, both of which are structurally complex, arose
spontaneously in the same place at the same time. Yet
it also seems impossible to have one without the other.
And so, at first glance, ONE MIGHT HAVE TO CONCLUDE
THAT LIFE COULD NEVER, IN FACT, HAVE ORIGINATED BY CHEMICAL
Saying "life could never have originated by chemical
means" is the equivalent of saying that "life
could never have originated by itself". Recognition
of the truth of this statement results in the realization
that life is created in a conscious way. For ideological
reasons, evolutionists, however, do not accept this
fact, clear evidence of which is before their eyes.
To avoid accepting the existence of God, they believe
in nonsensical scenarios, the impossibility of which
they are also convinced of.
his book "Evolution: A Theory in Crisis,"
about the invalidity of the theory of evolution, renowned
molecular biologist Prof. Michael Denton explains the
unreasonable conviction of Darwinists:
To the skeptic, the proposition that the genetic programmes
of higher organisms, consisting of something close to
a thousand million bits of information, equivalent to
the sequence of letters in a small library of one thousand
volumes, containing in encoded form countless thousands
of intricate algorithms controlling, specifying, and
ordering the growth and development of billions and
billions of cells into the form of a complex organism,
were composed by a purely random process is simply AN
AFFRONT TO REASON. BUT TO THE DARWINIST, THE IDEA IS
ACCEPTED WITHOUT A RIPPLE OF DOUBT - THE PARADIGM TAKES
Indeed, Darwinism is nothing but a totally unreasonable,
superstitious belief. Anyone with any reason would see
the evidence for that great fact by looking at DNA,
or any other part of the universe. Human beings and
all living things are created by God, the All-Mighty,
Who is the Lord of all the worlds.